MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067319288

L'Entrée d'Espagne della Biblioteca Marciana di Venezia nel contesto della illustrazione cavalleresca padana del Medioevo

2009· dissertation· en· W7067319288 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePadua Research Archive (University of Padova) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilologyStyle (visual arts)Context (archaeology)Meaning (existential)PoetryQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation focuses on the illustration of the illuminated manuscript Fr Z.21 (=257) (Venice, Biblioteca Marciana), the only evidence of the chivalric poem Entrée d’Espagne, written in a French-Venetian language by an anonymous author, who defined himself “patavian”, meaning Paduan. It is unanimous opinion of philologists that this anonymous author composed his work in the thirties or forties of the 14th century. \nAfter a reconstruction of the codex history, located in 1407 in the library of Francesco Gonzaga in Mantua, an overview of the chivalric illumination in Italy between the 13th and 14th centuries has been traced to identify the historical and the artistic context of the manuscript, with a special attention to the Veneto area. \nThe analysis of the illumination style points to a Paduan origin even if some elements may be revealing a Venetian influence. Three different periods have been recognized in the making of the manuscript illuminations: the first two are chronologically near and can be located in the second quarter of the 14th century, while the third one is surely subsequent, and can be assumed to be held in the last decade of the century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePadua Research Archive (University of Padova)Same topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207