MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067331187

L'examen des politiques monétaires d'assouplissement quantitatif

2016· other· fr· W7067331187 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuereroDoc Digital Library · 2016
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Sample (material)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce travail propose l’examen des mesures d’assouplissement quantitatif qui sont l’un des grands sujets d’actualité dans le monde des politiques monétaires et des Banques Centrales. Dans un premier temps, les fondements théoriques ainsi que les risques potentiels liés à ces mesures seront décrit. De surcroît, le rôle et le mandat des Banques Centrales seront aussi évoqués. Dans un deuxième temps, cette mesure sera illustrée par l’étude de trois situations où cette dernière a été adoptée par les autorités monétaires. Finalement, ces analyses permettront de démontrer les effets positifs et négatifs de ces politiques monétaires ainsi que les différentes applications possibles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuereroDoc Digital LibrarySame topicGlobal Education and MulticulturalismFrench-language works237,207