MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067332926

The matrix Dyson equation for machine learning: Correlated linearizations and the test error in random features regression

2024· dissertation· en· W7067332926 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegressionRegression analysisMatrix (chemical analysis)Linear regressionFeature (linguistics)Test (biology)Polynomial regression
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contemporary machine learning models, particularly deep learning models, are frequently trained on large datasets within high-dimensional feature spaces, presenting challenges for traditional analytical approaches.Notably, the effective generalization of highly overparameterized models contradicts conventional statistical wisdom.Furthermore, the presence of non-linear activations in artificial neural networks adds complexity to their analysis.To simplify theoretical analysis, it is often assumed that training data is sampled from an unstructured distribution.While such analyses offer insights into certain aspects of machine learning, they fall short in elucidating how neural networks extract information from the structure of the data, crucial for their success in real-world applications.Fortunately, random matrix theory has emerged as a valuable tool for theoretically understanding certain machine learning procedures.Various techniques have been employed to explore large random matrices through asymptotic deterministic equivalents.One such approach involves substituting the random resolvent associated with a large random matrix with the solution of a deterministic fixed-point equation known as the matrix Dyson equation.Another effective technique, known as the linearization trick, involves embedding a matrix expression into a larger random matrix, termed a linear matrix pencil, with a simplified correlation structure.In this thesis, we extend the matrix Dyson equation framework to derive an anisotropic global law for a broad class of pseudo-resolvents with general correlation structures.This extension enables the analysis of spectral properties of a wide range of random matrices using a simpler and deterministic solution to the matrix Dyson equation.Through the development of this theory, we address critical aspects such as existence-uniqueness, spectral support bounds, and stability properties.These considerations are essential for constructing i I wish to extend my deepest gratitude to Professors Courtney and Elliot Paquette, my supervisors, for their guidance and support throughout my academic journey.I consider myself incredibly fortunate to have had the opportunity to learn from them, and I am grateful for their constant availability, advice, and encouragement.Their mentorship has been instrumental in shaping me into the researcher I am today.They exemplify excellence in both research and mentorship, serving as role models for aspiring researchers like myself.I would also like to express my heartfelt thanks to Courtney for generously funding my studies and research.Courtney and Elliot, thank you for everything.I am also grateful to Professor Tim Hoheisel for introducing me to the field of mathematical optimization and providing continuous guidance.Although optimization is underrepresented in this thesis, it has significantly shaped my academic journey and greatly influenced my research interests.While I cannot name everyone, I would like to express my gratitude to the numerous brilliant students and faculty members who have made my time at McGill University memorable and enjoyable.Last but not least, I extend my heartfelt thanks to my family, friends, and partner for their unwavering support, encouragement, and understanding throughout this journey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207