MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067355527

Lloyds strategy out of state hands - was the issuance of contingent convertible bonds a key success factor? Effects of contingent convertible bonds issuance in bank´S profitability

2017· dissertation· en· W7067355527 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Estudos Anglo-Portugueses/Journal of Anglo-Portuguese Studies · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Therapy and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfitability indexConvertible bondBondConvertibleKey (lock)Bailout
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effects of contingent convertible bonds issuance in banks' profitability Lloyds Banking Group was object of a public bailout in 2008, following the merger with Halifax Bank of Scotland.In 2009, the bank issued the first worldwide series of contingent convertible bonds (CCBs).Being Lloyds Banking Group reprivatisation an apparent case of success, one should know if this issuance was a key success factor.Therefore, this work project analyses the effects of issuing CCBs in banks' profitability.Through the estimation of a multiple regression model, negative effects on banks' profitability was found resulting from the issuance.Nevertheless, other determinants, such as the regulatory framework, should also be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Estudos Anglo-Portugueses/Journal of Anglo-Portuguese StudiesSame topicArt Therapy and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207