Local use of Muscomed in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents the literature data and the results of our own investigation on the efficacy and safety of Muscomed cream in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. The study included 20 women (mean age 62 years). The study design included clinical and radiological examination of patients and survey using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the visual analogue scale at the beginning of treatment, on days 7 and 14 of using Muscomed cream. Muscomed cream was applied topically as a component of physiotherapeutic procedures as a part of a comprehensive conservative treatment. Two weeks after completing the course of treatment, there was a significant decrease in the intensity of pain syndrome and a decrease in the total WOMAC index in patients who used Muscomed cream locally. There was also a more pronounced decrease in the need for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients of the main group. The safety and efficacy of the Muscomed cream in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joints were demonstrated, which resulted in a decrease in the severity of pain syndrome and an improvement in the functional activity and quality of life of such patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".