From Metacartography to Metaatlasgraphy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metaatlasgraphy is a new theoretic-epistemological concept with synthesis of cartographic/cartosemiotic traditions and atlasgraphic/ atlassemiotic traditions. The monograph presents a new trend from a map-centric concept to a multidisciplinary atlas-centric concept. Further, it projects a new metascience direction: from metacartography to metaatlasgraphy.:Table of contents Introduction 4 1. Cartography 1970s-2020s: Digitalitization, Semiotization, Ubiquitization... 5 1.1. Selected scientific structures and concepts of cartography (1970-2020) 1.2. About paradigmatic transformations of cartography 1.3. Critical cartography as post-critical paradigm 1.4. Cybercartography: Canadian model of interactive atlascartography and theory- technological concept 2. Theoretical-Semiotic Evolution in Cartography 2010s - 2020s without Mainstream Cartography 15 2.1. Cartographic thinking and cartosemiotics 2.2. Atlases and atlascartography 2.3. Semiotic-related atlassing 2.4. Evolutionary trajectories in cartography and cartosemiotics 3. New Atlassemiotic Тrend: Photoаtlassing 35 3.1. Ubiquitous thematic photoatlases 3.2. Semiotik of photoatlases 3.2.1. Structure-semiotic features of photoatlases 3.2.2. Derivative photoatlases 3.2.3. Photoatlas design of one, two and three slide/parts layout 3.2.4.Methodic-analytical photoatlases 3.2.5. Meta-photoatlases 3.2.6. On robotic photoatlases 3.3. Cyberphotoatlassing – a new interdiscipline synthesis 3.4. Photoatlas science as academic discipline 4. About Metaatlasgraphy 59 4.1. Models of metatheoretical research and metacartographic epicenters 4.2. From metacartography and metacartosemiotics to metaatlasgraphy 4.3. Metaatlasgraphy 4.3.1. Terminological aspects 4.3.2. From cartosemiotic models to atlassemiotic models 4.3.3. Structural model of metaatlasgraphy 4.3.4. New metatheoretic epicenters 4.3.5 Metaatlasgraphic democratic principles 5. Conclusion 70 6. References 72 7. List of selected photoatlases 77 8. Short atlas semiotic dictionary 78 9. Information-semiotic profile and potential of book 81
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".