MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067520498

MIning Relationships Among variables in large datasets from CompLEx systems (MIRACLE)

2016· other· en· W7067520498 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJisc Repository (Jisc) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEconomic and Social Research CouncilUniversity of WaterlooArizona State UniversityUniversity of TwenteUniversity of DundeeJames Hutton Institute
KeywordsComplex systemSocial systemHuman dynamicsSocial dynamicsHuman behaviorStatistical model
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social scientists have used agent-based models (ABMs) to explore the interaction and feedbacks among social agents and their environments. Agent-based models are dynamic computer simulations of human societies and behaviours in which individuals and their interactions are explicitly represented. This bottom-up structure of ABMs enables simulation and investigation of complex systems and their emergent behaviour with a high level of detail. This detail means that such models have a very large number of variables, creating highly multidimensional “big data” that are difficult to analyse using traditional statistical methods, in part because many of the relationships among the variables are nonlinear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJisc Repository (Jisc)French-language works237,207