MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067585054

Moore Up North Episode 212 - Moore Up North: shot Nov. 11, 2010: Future of Tribal Sovereignty in Alaska

2010· other· en· W7067585054 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisdictionState (computer science)SovereigntyBureaucracyAdventureNova scotiaFederal jurisdictionJury
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTERVIEW Elstun Lauesen is a rural development specialist and consultant. Elstun contributed a chapter to Going Rouge, The Nation's response to Sarah Palin's Going Rogue. He is also a regular contributor to The Mudflats.net. PANEL David Case is an Attorney and Author of Alaskan Natives and American Laws He has a long and distinguished history in the field of Tribal Law in Alaska and has been involved in groundbreaking litigation involving Tribal sovereignty and the exercise of Tribal authority in post-ANCSA Alaska. Brad Garness was born of the Samish Tribal lineage in Alaska. He serves as the Executive Director of the Alaska Inter-Tribal Council. In that capacity, Brad has worked to improve humanitarian conditions in the most impoverished state in America. He admits to being a bit of a wonk in that he actually reads complex bureaucratic documents like the tribal consultation guidelines being written by the Obama administration. Natalie Landreth is an Attorney for the Native American Rights Fund(NARF)here in Alaska. She is an enrolled member of the Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma, and a descendent of the Imatobby family. Natalie practices a broad range of Indian law from jurisdiction issues to fishing rights.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2730.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207