MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7067629545

Nature of TSST-1 Production by Staphylococcus aureus in Aberrant Vaginal Conditions

2011· article· en· W7067629545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaphylococcus aureusToxic shock syndromeStreptococcus agalactiaeVaginaBacteriaLactobacillusStrain (injury)Streptococcaceae
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Menstrual-toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a serious illness that afflicts women of pre-menopausal age worldwide, and arises from vaginal infection by Staphylococcus aureus and concurrent production of toxic shock syndrome toxin- 1 (TSST-1). The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of aberrant vaginal states and indigenous vaginal bacteria on production of TSST-1 and identify women who are most susceptible to menstrual-TSS. A TSST-1 reporter strain of S. aureus was grown in the presence of vaginal swab contents collected from women in London, Ontario with healthy and aberrant vaginal states. Gene expression assays were also conducted to monitor toxin production in response to indigenous vaginal bacteria. This study found that Streptococcus agalactiae significantly induces TSST-1 production, while resident Lactobacillus spp. suppress production. Results also indicate that women with aerobic vaginitis, but not bacterial vaginosis, may be more susceptible to menstrual-TSS and would benefit most from prophylactic treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies→French-language works237,207→