Mickey & Judy, December 3 – 7, 2013
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mickey & Judy is a hilarious pseudo-memoir, chronicling Sheridan alumni Hughes’ childhood obsession with musicals and his journey from the psychiatric ward to Off-Broadway. Chock-full of comical anecdotes about his childhood spent channelling Judy Garland, dramatic readings from his actual doctor’s charts, and a musical score that borrows from Broadway classics and the Judy Garland songbook, Mickey & Judy is about learning to accept yourself and following your dreams. Since its world premiere at the 2011 Toronto Fringe Festival, Mickey & Judy has performed across North America and Internationally to sold-out audiences and rave five-star review. Mickey & Judy has been nominated for the 2011 Broadway World Award for “Best Independent Theatre Production”, the 2011 Entertainment World Award for “Best Fringe Actor”, and the 2012 Canadian Comedy Award for “Best One Person Show".\nMickey & Judy was created by and starred Michael Hughes.\nDirector: Michael Hughes\nMusical Director: Douglas Price
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.376 | 0.134 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".