Minor ailments in older adults A study of health-related behaviors of seniors in response to minor health conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the global senior population expected to double by 2050 -- and nearly one in four Canadians projected to be 65 or older by 2040 -- understanding how older adults manage minor health conditions is increasingly vital. This study explored the prevalence, symptom burden, and treatment responses for 30 common ailments in older adults, and assessed their attitudes toward self-care and over-the-counter medication use. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 356 seniors (65+) in Saskatchewan. Participants completed a 15-minute questionnaire assessing symptoms experienced in the prior two weeks, associated pain and disruption (7-point Likert scale), and treatment actions (e.g., watchful waiting, non-pharmacologic strategies, OTC use, or healthcare consultation). Respondents also completed the PSM-OTC scale, measuring self-efficacy, OTC awareness, and purchasing behavior. Results showed that participants reported an average of 6.2 ailments over two weeks. Back pain (46.9%), joint pain (44.4%), and insomnia (38.5%) were most common. Chronic symptoms such as joint pain and erectile dysfunction had the highest persistence rates (98.7% and 97.7%, respectively). OTC medications were the most frequently used management strategy, particularly for headache (63.2%) and heartburn (61.2%), while watchful waiting was common for tinnitus (80.5%) and loneliness (74.2%). Satisfaction and confidence in self-management were highest for acute conditions like headache and cold sores, and lowest for chronic or sensitive issues like erectile dysfunction and tinnitus. PSM-OTC scores were significantly higher among frequent OTC users and female participants (p < 0.001), suggesting strong health autonomy and informed decision-making. High scores on subscales such as purchase involvement and risk awareness highlighted a conscious and responsible approach to self-care. These findings underscore the critical need to support self-management in older adults by improving access to reliable information, encouraging pharmacist engagement, and addressing gaps in care for persistent or sensitive symptoms. This can enhance quality of life and reduce the burden on formal healthcare systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".