MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067816677

Nest, Rest, Shadows: Tracing the Echoes of Motherhood

2025· other· en· W7067816677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive reframingEphemeral keyEmbodied cognitionAssertionQuake (natural phenomenon)NarrativeGesturePerformative utterancePropositionCitizen journalism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nest, Rest, Shadows explores the surreal and embodied dimensions of motherhood and caregiving, translating its unseen experiences into material form through participatory engagement. Exhibited at OCAD University Grad Gallery, Toronto, the project examines caregiving as an imprint—a gesture that lingers beyond the moment of touch, existing between presence and absence, resilience and exhaustion. The work engages with rest as a radical act, challenging the relentless demands of caregiving and reframing maternal experiences as an assertion of agency rather than passive nurturing. Clay, with its capacity to hold traces of touch, serves as both a vessel of memory and an ephemeral archive of care. The recurring motif of the clenched fist embodies both protection and defiance, blurring distinctions between intimacy and isolation, tenderness and endurance. Through audience participation, the work creates a shifting landscape of gestures, each imprint contributing to a shared dialogue on care, loss, and resilience. Nest, Rest, Shadows asserts that caregiving is not only an act of service but a force that transforms space, memory, and identity, imprinting itself on both the body and collective consciousness. Keywords: caregiving, maternal, participatory, rest, memory, resilience, performance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0100.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCAD University Open Research Repository (OCAD University)French-language works237,207