MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067831355

Modeling Urban Host Tree Distributions for Invasive Forest Pests Using a Multi-Step Approach

2016· article· en· W7067831355 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFurman University Scholar Exchange (Furman University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal areaUrban forestTree canopyUrban forestryTree (set theory)Host (biology)Forest ecologyForest inventoryUrban ecology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many invasive pest species currently impacting forested ecosystems in North America first appeared in urban forests. Despite serving as critical gateways for the spread of forest pests, urban forests remain less well documented than their “natural” forest counterparts. Only a small percentage of communities in the US and Canada have completed any sort of urban forest inventory, and these inventories usually have been limited to street trees. We devised a multi-step approach that utilizes the available local inventory data to model urban host tree distributions at a regional scale. We illustrate the approach for three tree genera – ash (Fraxinus), maple (Acer), and oak (Quercus) – that are associated with high-profile insect pests. Available inventory data included 60 sample-based inventories of entire cities (i-Tree Eco inventories) and 500 street tree inventories. First, we used co-kriging to estimate the whole-city tree compositions based on street tree inventories. Next, we used boosted decision trees to model the proportion of the total basal area (as a proxy for forest volume) occupied by each genus in non-inventoried communities as a function of a suite of environmental and demographic variables. We then modeled total urban forest basal area on canopy cover of these communities using a generalized additive model. We combined these estimates to construct region-wide urban distribution maps for each genus. By merging these maps with similar data on natural forests, we are able to provide a more complete host setting for spread modeling efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFurman University Scholar Exchange (Furman University)Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207