Montreal and St Petersburg: case studies of urban immigration policy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Выпускная квалификационная работа посвящена городской политике в сфере иммиграции и интеграции иммигрантов. \nОбъектом исследования является процесс интеграции иммигрантов в Санкт-Петербурге и Монреале.\nЦелью исследования является сравнительный анализ городской политики в сфере иммиграции и интеграции иммигрантов в Санкт-Петербурге и Монреале.\nПересечение двух важных тенденция современности: урбанизации и иммиграции – определяет актуальность рассматриваемой темы. Проведенный анализ позволяет выделить тенденции развития городской политики в сфере иммиграции.\nСтруктура работы представлена ведением, тремя главами, заключением и списком литературы. Общий объем работы составляет 82 страницы.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.019 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".