MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7067988551

The Montreal classification for Crohn's disease: clinical application to a Brazilian single-center cohort of 90 consecutive patients

2010· article· en· W7067988551 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseReferralOutpatient clinicCohort studyRetrospective cohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Crohn's disease presents very heterogeneous features from a clinical point of view, and classifying Crohn's disease patients in homogeneous subgroups in the light of genetic, molecular and clinical aspects is challenging. The Montreal Classification for Crohn's disease was proposed in 2005 as an effort to characterize Crohn's disease patients according to recent clinical and research advances in the field of inflammatory bowel disease. Since its proposition, the Montreal Classification needs an ample validation and application among different populations around the world. To date, there are no known studies applying the Montreal Classification to a Brazilian cohort of Crohn's disease patients. OBJECTIVES: To apply the Montreal Classification to a Brazilian cohort of Crohn's disease patients at a referral center for inflammatory bowel disease in Northwestern São Paulo State, Brazil. METHODS: We selected 90 consecutive well-characterized Crohn's disease patients assisted at Inflammatory Bowel Disease Outpatient Clinic between January 1992 and January 2007, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years; data concerning demographic characteristics, clinical onset of disease, age at diagnosis, time of disease, location and behavior of disease, presence of extraintestinal manifestations, familial occurrence, perianal involvement, treatment with biological drugs, and history of surgical treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: Male patients were predominant (54%), with a mean age at diagnosis of 33 ± 14 years old, and a median followup of 5.5 years. Most of the patients were diagnosed between 17 and 40 years old (59%), and had disease located in terminal ileum 46%), with a nonstricturing, nonpenetrating behavior (71%). Time of disease was correlated with necessity of biological treatment, disease behavior, and surgical treatment (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These study findings are consistent with results from other studies conducted among different populations, although a further multicentric study with a larger number of patients would be necessary to validate the Montreal Classification among Brazilian population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber OpticsFrench-language works237,207