Mother Seigel's home companion : contains a valuable store of information on things you have often asked about.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
laid the foundation of the enormous and almost unbelievable Canadian expansion now taking place in all directions. 1 How Can You be Well If You Don't Digest Your Food ?NOW how can you?Nature compels us to eat food daily-to renew our strength, to increase our vitality, and to replace the daily wear and tear of our bodies.Daily, hourly, yes, eVery moment of your life.Nature is building up your body, and breaking it down again."You, that is, yourself^ are not the person you were ten years ago.Ten years ago you had muscles, sinew, nerve, and brain.You have them to-day, it is true, but they are not the same.In the years that have passed they have been worn away and rebuilt again.Sit back in your chair and turn that over in your mind for a moment or two.Then you will realise that as all this wearing out and building up of the body is going on so continuously and so certainly you really must eat daily a sufficient quantity of good food to keep up your strength.You simply must.And yet that's just where the rub comes in.Given plenty of good and nourishing food it by no means follows that a man will be really healthy.Not at all.Perfect health is impossible without sound digestion.For food cannot possibly nourish your body and sustain your life unless it is digested.If people m would only realise this simple fact, they would regard indigestion that is bad digestionas a serious menace to their health.When you have indigestion, when your digestive organs-the stomach, liver, and bowelsgo on strike as it were, you are bound to experience various distressing symptoms, such as headaches, flatulence, loss of appetite, pains after eating, languor and depression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.457 | 0.287 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".