MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7068139376

16N calibration and background studies for SNO+

2022· dissertation· en· W7068139376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScintillatorCalibrationDetectorScintillationCherenkov radiationCherenkov detectorLiquid scintillation countingEnergy (signal processing)Particle detector
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SNO+ is a multipurpose scintillator based neutrino experiment which is located 2km underground at SNOLAB, Creighton mine, Sudbury. The primary physics goal of the experiment is the search for the elusive process of neutrino-less double beta decay with 130Te loaded into the liquid scintillator cocktail. In addition, SNO+ will be able to detect low energy solar neutrinos, geo- and reactor-antineutrinos, as well as supernova neutrinos. SNO+ has completed its water phase in 2019. During the water phase SNO+ made measurements of 8B neutrinos, and improved the limits on the lifetime of nucleon decay. Aside from the physics goals, the optical and energy calibration of the detector was accomplished in water phase. SNO+ has finished filling the detector in May 2022, and preparing for the 130Te phase. This thesis consists of author’s major contributions to the experiment: i) calibration analysis described in chapter 7, and ii) the background analyses discussed in chapter 6 and chapter 7. Chapter 5 focuses on the calibration of SNO+ detector using 16N calibration source. The tagged 6.1 MeV γ’s from 16N provided the primary energy calibration data in the water phase. Furthermore, the source was deployed externally throughout the scintillator filling process, and the data was used for various calibration purposes such as studying the scintillation light yield, verifying the reconstruction algorithms, characterizing the scintillation timing, and studying the Cherenkov signal in liquid scintillator. The second part of my analysis focuses on background analyses in SNO+. Chapter 6 describes a model that I have used to estimate the effective attenuation length of the detector in scintillator phase. The model was used to fit the tagged 214Po events in scintillator phase, and estimate the effective attenuation length. The result is consistent with other studies. Moreover, chapter 7 focuses on the external backgrounds. A set of timing and angular classifiers have been developed, and originally optimised to distinguish the external backgrounds from 0νββ signal. I have utilised these classifiers to investigate their performance for the detectable solar ν signals. The classifiers found effective, however it is demonstrated that the performance can be significantly improved by taking advantage of supervised learning methods. ROOT TMVA was used for this classification study. Furthermore, I have used the partial-fill scintillator data to estimate the level of the external backgrounds. The 2.6 MeV γ signal from the external 208Tl is identified in partial-fill. Furthermore, the level of external 208Tl γ’s from the hold-down ropes are estimated by taking advantage of their angular symmetry. The estimated result is consistent with previous measurements taken in water phase. Moreover, I have used the vertical displacements of the AV to estimate the creep rate of the hold-down rope system during the partial-fill period. This analysis is described in appendix A. Furthermore, the long-term stability tests of the Tensylon fibres are described in the second part of appendix A. Finally, the leaching model is briefly described in appendix B. I have developed this model as part of my MSc. research. During my first year of Ph.D, I had the chance to complete the model and develop a simple python tool to estimate the surface activity, and the level of leached isotopes for different filling scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207