MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7068164807

Nursing Clinical Instructors’ Perceived Supports and Barriers to Reporting Medication Errors, Near Misses, and Discovered Errors

2021· dissertation· en· W7068164807 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFractal and DNA sequence analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmPatient safetyPerceptionSample (material)MEDLINEData collectionHealth careSample size determinationNurse educationScale (ratio)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Medication administration errors (MAEs) are common in healthcare, and one of the leading causes of harm and death. Not only do these errors lead to a decrease in overall patient safety, but they are also a large financial burden globally. It is essential that nurses report MAEs so that healthcare systems can identify causative factors and implement preventative measures. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore clinical instructors’ perceptions of the supports and barriers experienced when prompting student nurses to report medication incidents during clinical rotations. Methods: This study utilized a descriptive, cross-sectional method and convenience sampling to recruit clinical instructors currently employed in a baccalaureate nursing program in Southwestern Ontario. A Qualtrics survey was emailed to all potential participants. Data was analyzed utilizing SPSS software. Results: A total of 28 surveys were completed out of the potential 96 participants, yielding a 29.1% response rate. The average years of experience was 17 years as a registered nurse and 6.5 years as a clinical instructor. A total of 86% of participants stated that they encourage their students to report all types of MAEs 76% - 100% of the time. The strongest supports identified were: “education at clinical meetings help me to understand the reporting system and importance of reporting” and “thank you for reporting email”. The largest barrier identified was “I don’t have the time to encourage reporting because I am busy with other clinical instructor responsibilities”. Conclusion: Due to the small sample size obtained and skewness of the data, further research is recommended. Clinical instructors are essential to the hands-on learning of nursing students. Decreasing the barriers and increasing the supports to reporting is a crucial strategy to decrease the number of MAEs in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicFractal and DNA sequence analysisFrench-language works237,207