Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESEARCH BACKGROUND\n'Building Movements' was a workshop and exhibition project curated by Pia Ednie-Brown, to explore how event-based approaches can effectively leverage Creative Practice Research as an alternative research paradigm that sustains increasing enquiry and attention globally. The project developed an event-based mode of critique, engaging with RMIT's Design Hub Building as a site for research and experimentation.\n RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION:\n'Building Movements' offered specific attention to the role and impact that (architectural) research environments have on the research occurring within them. This offers a significant contribution to the area, where the majority of event-based, participatory, creative practice research focuses attention on social, cultural and political dimensions, leaving the impacts of architectural environments un-acknowledged. This work demonstrates Ednie-Brown's ongoing leadership in the innovation of Creative Practice Research.\nRESEARCH SIGNIFICANCE:\nThis work is located within a seven year international partnership project, Immediations: Media, Art and Event(CAN$2.91 million), led by internationally significant philosophers Prof Erin Manning and Prof Brian Massumi,funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Canada) and involving researchers from 14 institutions and 17 community partners across Canada, Denmark, Netherlands, Switzerland, Australia, USA. It seeks to articulate event-based modes through which this research paradigm most effectively proceeds. It led to two peer-reviewed journal articles: 'Critical Passions: Building architectural movements toward a radical pedagogy (in 10 steps), Inflexions 8, Radical Pedagogies (April 2015); and 'Building Movements (in ten steps)',Architectural Design Research Symposium 20 - 21 November 2014, Conference Proceedings, Jan Smitheram, Jules Moloney & Simon Twose (eds) (ISBN 978-0-475-12415-9).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it