Bibliographic record
Abstract
CONTENIDO\n\n\nPresentación\n\n\n\nInvestigación\n\n\n\n\nLa Integración Regional y las Negociaciones del ALCA\n\n\n Vacchino, Juan Mario \n\n\n\n\nLa construcción de una madeja institucional en las negociaciones del ALCA\n\n\n Yonis Lombano, Mirna J. \n\n\n\n\nEl ALCA y los Patrones de Comercio entre Estados Unidos y Venezuela\n\n Genua, Gladis \n \n\n\n\nVenezuela y su participación en el ALCA: opciones y desafíos\n\n Alvarez, Raquel; Briceño Ruiz, José; Bustamante, Marleny \n\n\n\n\nEl ALCA en la Perspectiva de Colombia\n\n Pulecio, Jorge R. \n\n\n\n\nLa Cuenca del Caribe frente al reto de la Integración Hemisférica. El caso de la maquila en México y República Dominicana\n\n Mathews, Dale T. \n\n\n\n\nLa Posición de México frente al Proyecto de Integración Energética Hemisférica del ALCA\n\n Arriaga Rodríguez, Juan Carlos \n\n\n\n\nMERCOSUR, ALCA y BRASIL: Una evaluación política sobre posibles estrategias de actuación diplomática\n\n de Almeida, Paulo Roberto \n\n\n\n\nAnalísis\n\n\n\n\nLas negociaciones del MERCOSUR en el marco del ALCA y con la UE\n\n Bouzas, Roberto; da Motta Veiga, Pedro \n \n\n\n\nAgenda\n\n\n\nDe las relaciones Colombo/Venezolanas (noviembre 2001/abril 2002)\n\n Pécora, Laura \n\n\n\n\nIndice acumulado\n\n\nReseñas\n\n\n\nQue las "rondas" no son buenas ... La OMC y la ronda de doha: ¿proteccionismo vs. desarrollo?\n Autora: Rosas, María Cristina\n Universidad Autónoma de México y La Secretaria permanente del Sistema Económico \n Latinoamericano. 2003 \n Reseñado por: Bustamante, Juan Carlos \n\n\n\nPublicaciones
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.125 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".