MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7068883156

Gamify your Goals

2021· article· en· W7068883156 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons-IMSA (Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Track (disk drive)Rest (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)Front (military)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Students will set personal goals for themselves to achieve throughout the quarter or semester. Students will keep track of their own personal progress, which will be shared with the rest of the wing. The wing's total progress will be tracked, allowing everyone in the wing to encourage each other's progress and track milestones of their classmates and wing community. Goal of this program is to use the concept of “Gamification” to help encourage students to be more motivated to achieve their own personal goals. The wing and/or individual students may earn rewards based on milestones or whoever has made the most progress with their goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigitalCommons-IMSA (Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy)Same topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207