Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Introduction \n2 Ship structures \n2.1 Environment-induced vibrations \n2.1.1 Wave-induced vibration \n2.1.2 Ice-induced vibration \n2.2 Machinery or propeller-induced vibrations \n2.2.1 Propeller-induced vibration \n2.2.2 Machinery-induced vibration \n2.2.3 Numerical and analytical vibration studies of ship structures \n2.3 Noise \n2.3.1 Interior noise \n2.3.2 Air radiated noise \n2.3.3 Underwater radiated noise \n2.4 Sloshing impact \n2.4.1 Experimental approaches \n2.4.2 Numerical modelling \nCommittee II.2 Dynamic response \nD.S. Cho, Korea (Chair) \nS. Brizzolara, USA \nI. Chirica, Romania \nA. Düster, Germany \nA. Ergin, Turkey \nO.A. Hermundstad, Norway \nM. Holtmann, Germany \nC. Hung, China (Taiwan) \nA. Ivaldi, Italy \nC. Ji, China \nW.H. Joo, Korea \nB. Leira, Norway \nS. Malenica, France \nY. Ogawa, Japan \nM.A. Vaz, Brazil \nA. Vredeveldt, Netherlands \nY. Xiong, UK \nD. Zhan, Canada \nCOMMITTEE MANDATE: Concern for the dynamic structural response of ship and floating \noffshore structures as required for safety and serviceability assessments, including habitability. \nThis should include steady state, transient and random responses. Attention shall be given to \ndynamic responses resulting from environmental, machinery and propeller excitation. Uncertainties \nassociated with modelling should be highlighted. \n2.4.3 CCS structural response \n2.4.4 Current approaches for sloshing assessment \n2.5 Air blast and underwater explosion \n2.5.1 Air blast \n2.5.2 Underwater explosion \n2.6 Damping and countermeasures \n2.7 Monitoring \n2.7.1 Hull structural monitoring system \n2.7.2 New sensors technology and application \n2.7.3 New full scale monitoring campaigns and related studies \n2.8 Uncertainties \n2.9 Standards and acceptance criteria \n2.9.1 Habitability \n2.9.2 Underwater noise \n2.9.3 Others \n3. Offshore structures \n3.1 Vibration \n3.1.1 Wind-induced vibration \n3.1.2 Wave-induced vibration \n3.1.3 Vortex-induced motion \n3.1.4 Internal flow-induced vibration \n3.1.5 Ice-induced vibration \n3.2 Very large floating structures \n3.3 Noise \n3.3.1 Analysis of underwater noise by pile-driving \n3.3.2 Measurement and mitigation of underwater noise \n3.3.3 Equipment noise \n3.4 Blast \n3.5 Damping and countermeasures \n3.6 Uncertainties \n3.7 Standards and acceptance criteria \n4 Conclusion \n5 References
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.350 | 0.203 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".