MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7069016800

Policy / Law

2013· other· en· W7069016800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDiverse Interdisciplinary Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual orientationAction (physics)Human rightsDiversity (politics)Affirmative actionIdentity (music)LegislationPublic policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Canada: a. Parental Rights b. Discrimination forbidden (Sexuality, trans* not as clear) in human rights law (Different in different provinces) c. Quebec-GSA not on popular strategy d. Homophobia within broader anti bullying e. Bill S6 discrimination/violence protection sexual f. Orientation and identity in schools (public/private) g. Action plan(Prevention plans denouncing, include parents, local variation). 2. Australia: a. Some discrimination protection in states but not nationally (religious exemptions issue) b. Policies anti-homophobia/support sexual diversity in VIC, NSW, TAS, some resources in SA, ACT, and others different (QCD, WA, NT none).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.570
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0110.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.094

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiverse Interdisciplinary Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207