Bibliographic record
Abstract
La figura del uxoricida aparece en muchas literaturas nacionales, pero la comedia española presenta tantos argumentos en que el marido mata a su esposa que llega a ser un verdadero subgénero. El uxoricidio es tan importante dentro de la historia literaria de la época que algunos han llegado a declarar, equivocadamente, que la matanza de una mujer representaba fielmente cierta peculiaridad del carácter nacional español, sobre todo cuando se trataba también del honor. Es verdad que la autoridad legal de matar a una esposa adúltera aparece en el Fuero juzgo, pero ya no estaba en vigor en el siglo XVII, y la sociedad ya había cambiado de la tradición medieval del castigo personal a un sistema moderno y burócrata de fiscales y tribunales que dispensaban un castigo social y anónimo. Hay unas cuantas comedias que tienen raíces históricas, como Los comendadores de Córdoba, pero muchos datos indican que los casos verdaderos de uxoricidio no ocurrían frecuentemente, y que, si un hombre mató a su esposa, casi siempre fue castigado.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.103 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".