MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7069245463

The Arabian Nights

2021· article· en· W7069245463 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLux Scholarship And Creativity At Lawrence University (Lawrence University) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRIPS architectureCornerstoneCurriculumSpace (punctuation)Tribute
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This lecture on the Arabian Nights was recorded in February 2021. The lecture was designed for students and faculty in the Freshman Studies program. This program, a multidisciplinary introduction to liberal learning, has been a cornerstone of the Lawrence curriculum since 1945. The lecturer, Martyn Smith, is Associate Professor of Religious Studies at Lawrence. Professor Smith joined the Lawrence faculty in 2006. He holds a B.A. in Theology from Prairie Bible College in Alberta, Canada; an M.A. in Theology from Fuller Seminary, in Pasadena, California; and a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia. Professor Smith believes in the importance of students encountering religious sites and so leads annual trips to visit mosques in Dearborn, Michigan. He has also led students on field experience trips to Morocco and Senegal. Beginning with his book Religion, Culture, and Sacred Space (Palgrave, 2008), Professor Smith has concentrated on questions concerning the human interaction with place. He has written academic essays on medieval Cairo and has recently expanded his work into a comparative online examination of sacred space around the globe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.206

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0620.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLux Scholarship And Creativity At Lawrence University (Lawrence University)Same topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207