Bibliographic record
Abstract
SITE NAME OR SITE NUMBER: Paul Mitchell\nVESSEL NO.: 6-2-91, Burial 36\nVESSEL FORM: Carinated bowl\nNON-PLASTICS AND PASTE: grog and bone\nRIM AND LIP FORM: Direct rim and rounded lip\nCORE COLOR: G (fired in a reducing environment and cooled in the open air)\nINTERIOR SURFACE COLOR: very dark grayish-brown; fire clouds on the base\nEXTERIOR SURFACE COLOR: brown; fire clouds on the rim, body, and base\nWALL THICKNESS (IN MM): rim, 6.6 mm\nINTERIOR SURFACE TREATMENT: smoothed\nEXTERIOR SURFACE TREATMENT: burnished\nHEIGHT (IN CM): 6.4\nORIFICE DIAMETER (IN CM): 18.4\nDIAMETER AT BOTTOM OF RIM OR NECK (IN CM): 18.4\nBASE DIAMETER (IN CM) AND SHAPE OF BASE: 8.9; circular and rounded\nESTIMATED VOLUME (IN LITERS): 0.7\nDECORATION (INCLUDING MOTIF AND ELEMENTS WHEN APPARENT): The upper part of the rim has three horizontal engraved lines. The remainder of the rim has seven engraved elements: a narrow and elongated excised rectangle, with an eye-shaped circle at one end (see Suhm and Jelks 1962:Plate 9f). The circle element has excised tick marks around its radius.\nPIGMENT USE AND LOCATION ON VESSEL: white pigment in the engraved lines\nTYPE AND VARIETY (IF KNOWN): Bowie Engraved\nBowie Engraved carinated bowl in Burial 36 at the Paul Mitchell site (41BW4).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.885 | 0.804 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".