Où va l'analyse des politiques publiques au 21e siècle?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette section thématique offre une réflexion prospective sur l’analyse des politiques publiques en réunissant les auteurs majeurs aujourd'hui en science politique et en analyse des politiques publiques. Français, belges, québécois, suisses entre autres, ces auteurs contribuent à la rédaction d’un traité dans la collection Les Traités de la Science politique dirigée par Yves Déloye. Deux objectifs sont assignés à chaque communication: (a) dresser un état de l'art sur les acteurs ou les lieux ou les étapes des politiques publiques et (b) réaliser un exercice prospectif en termes de portée de l'analyse des politiques publiques concernant ces mêmes acteurs ou lieux ou étapes. La discussion entre les participants permet à la fois de revenir sur le contenu de chaque communication et d’alimenter la réflexion en vue de la rédaction du traité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".