Pas juste une question de langue : l'identite nationale et l'exiguite litteraire dans les recits franco-manitobains et acadiens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les institutions littéraires francophones du Canada cherchent à répondre à la même question que se posent les communautés dont elles font partie. Qui sommes-nous? Cette étude fait ressortir les tendances et les caractéristiques des littératures francophones minoritaires en s’appuyant sur l’œuvre de deux auteurs, J.R. Léveillé au Manitoba francophone et Antonine Maillet en Acadie. Cette analyse éclaire les approches différentes que prennent les écrivains face à l’écriture. Ceux-ci se rangent soit du côté de la tradition, de l’histoire nationale et de la mémoire, soit du côté du moderne, du nouveau et du rejet du passé. En s’appuyant sur les théories d’Anne-Marie Thiesse, de François Paré et d’Éric Méchoulan, cette étude remarque que les tendances littéraires se manifestent à travers l’écriture et la réécriture de l’H/histoire, l’intertextualité, la langue et l’inclusion (ou non) des référents culturels et mémoriels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".