MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070264983

A parallel graph-based approach for protein sequence motif discovery

2007· dissertation· en· W7070264983 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQR Code Applications and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSequence (biology)Motif (music)Peptide sequenceSequence motifProtein sequencingSequence alignment
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis pro','ides a parallel, graph based approach to discover conservecl regons such as motifs n Protein sequences.The motif discover.vproblem has gainecl lot of significa'ce i'r biologlcal scence o'er the past decade.Recently, r,arious approaches have been used srrccessl,lll' to discorer motifs.some of theur are basecl on proba- rilistic appr-oach and the otirers on a combinatorial approach.Tiris thesis rolou,s a graph-based approach to solve this problern, in partcular.using the icea of de Bruijr gaphs The de Bruij'graph has been successfully aroptec i. rle past to solve prob- lens such as locai multiple aligrment and DNA flagment assembly.The proposed algorithni hanesses the power of the de Bruju graph to <scover the corserred re- gior.rs in a protei sequence.The sequentia.lalgorithm has z0% matcires of the rrotil.s*ith the r'fEME and 65% patter'rratches with the Gibbs motif sampler.The algo- rthrn s redesigned and parallelized on the high perfbrma.ncecomputers a'ailable on the Wcstern Canada Reserr"h Grid (WestGricl).Perfbrmance analysis was urade on a pure distributed memorl' luachine using ol' message passing anc on a hybricl ra- chinr: using shared and clistributed access space.Experiments shou,ed that the hyrrid i.rpementation runs 3 times a"s fast s the pure distributec memorv implenentafion.this thcsjs.I rvould lke to thank m1' supcrvisor Dr. Parinaa Thulasiranan for her continuous guidar:rce and encouragenent to develop tris rvork.We acknou'erge the partial support fiom Natural Science and Engineering R.e- search Councl(NSERC) of Canada.\tly sincere thanks to the managenent of \\:cstgricl lbr allowing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it