OTTAWA TREATY: FROM THE BOTTOM TO THE TOP IN THE INTERNATIONAL AGENDA. A CLASSICAL MULTILATERAL INSTITUTION?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMENEl Tratado de Ottawa es un hito en la historia del multilateralismo.Por primera vez, miles de organizaciones no gubernamentales, la ONU y la Cruz Roja, de manera coordinada, llamaron la atención a los gobiernos del mundo sobre la necesidad de poner fin al uso de las Minas Antipersonas (MAP), un arma de guerra que ha causado mutilaciones, muertes y sufrimiento a millones de personas.El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar el proceso desde la base y mostrar cómo el tema surgió hasta convertirse en un asunto de interés internacional, así como examinar el Tratado de Ottawa a la luz de los preceptos de los teóricos Ruggie (Anatomía de una institución multilateral) y Keohane (legitimidad) y determinar qué tanto se aproxima a una institución multilateral de tipo clásico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".