MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070309836

Özel alışveriş sitelerininin kompulsif satın alma davranışına yansımaları

2014· other· tr· W7070309836 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMarmara University Open Access System · 2014
Typeother
Languagetr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Consumption (sociology)PhenomenonFocus (optics)Alma mater
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tüketim olgusu yüz yılın son çeyreğinden bu yana yalnızca ekonomik değil aynı zamanda toplumsal ve kültürel bir olgu olarak belirginleşmeye başlamıştır. 21. yy gelindiğinde ise, gelişen teknoloji sayesinde tüketicilerin günün her anı tüketimle içi içe imkânına sahip olmuşlardır. Bu yeni bir yüzyılda tüketiciler, fiziksel mağazaların kalabalığından maruz kalmadan, satın alınan ürünlerin ödemesini yapabilmek için sırada beklemek zorunda olmadıkları, istenilen an istenilen yerde alışveriş yapılabilme imkanına sahip oldukları çevrimiçi alışveriş ile tanışmışlar. Yine aynı dönemlerde, kronik, süreklik gösteren bir satın alma davranışı olarak kompulsif satın alma davranışı tanımlanmış ve çevrimiçi alışverişin her an erişilebilen ve sosyalleşme zorunluluğunu ortadan kaldıran doğası ile çevrimiçi alışverişte kullanılan uygulamaların kompulsif satın alma davranışına etkileri, üzerinde çalışılmaya başlanmıştır.\nBir çevrimiçi alışveriş mecrası olarak özel alışveriş sitelerinin kullandıkları uygulamaların kompulsif satın alma davranışı üzerindeki etkisi, literatürde yer alan çeşitli araştırmalar ile ortaya konmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı; Türkiye’de aktif durumda olan bütün özel alışveriş sitelerinde, koşulsuz iade, sepetin boşaltılması, ürünlerin sepette tutulması, mail gönderme, kupon&puan, çapraz satış ve fiyat indirimi uygulamalarının var olup olmadığının içerik analizi yöntemi ile incelenmesidir. Elde edilen bulgular değerlendirildiğinde ise, özel alışveriş sitelerinin sepette tutma, hatırlatıcı e-posta gönderme ve çapraz satış uygulaması dışında kalan, koşulsuz iade, sepeti boşaltma, kampanya e-posta gönderme, kupon& puan ve indirim yazısı uygulamalarının siteler tarafından kullanıldığı ortaya çıkarılmıştır. \n Anahtar Kelimeler: Tüketim, Kompulsif Satın Alma Davranışı, Özel Alışveriş Siteleri \nABSTRACT\nThe conception of consumption has come into focus not only as a societal phenomenon but also as a cultural issue since the last quarter of the century. Yet; since the beginning of the 21st century, consumers have had the chance to be in touch with consumption in every phase of their daily lives. In this century, modern day consumers have been familiar with the concept of online shopping, which enables them to do shopping wherever and whenever they want without being exposed to crowded department stores and waiting in the queue to pay the bill. In the same manner; compulsive buying behavior has emerged as a purchasing habit that is chronic and perpetual. Also, the nature of online shopping which eliminates the obligation of socializing together with its effects on compulsive buying behavior has been a matter of study. The influence of private shopping websites as a means of online marketing on compulsive buying behavior has been put forward thanks to significant research in the realm. The aim of this research is to investigate with content analysis method whether there is the practice of unconditional return, emptying the basket, keeping the products in the basket, sending e-mail, coupon&point, cross selling and discount technics in all of the active private shopping websites in Turkey. When everything is taken into consideration, the fact that private shopping websites have utilized the technics of unconditional return, emptying the basket, sending special offer e-mails, coupon&point and discount notices except reminder e-mails, keeping the products in the basket and cross selling methods.\nKeywords: Consumption, Compulsive Buying, Private Shopping Websites

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0120.022
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarmara University Open Access SystemSame topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207