Over a Decade Later: What Now? What Next? A Multilayered Assessment of Terrorism in its Current and Future Manifestation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
List of Discussion Session Participants: Mr. Gary Ackerman (START), Dr. John Arquilla (NPS), Dr. Victor Asal (SUNY-Albany), Maj David Blair (Harvard University), Mr. Randy Burkett (NPS), Dr. Bill Casebeer (DARPA), Dr. Steve Corman (Arizona State University), Dr. Martha Crenshaw (Stanford University), Dr. Bill Durodie? (Royal Roads University, Canada) , Ms. Laurie Fenstermacher (USAF), Mr. Dan Flynn (DNI/NIC), Dr. Heather Gregg (NPS), Dr. Tawfik Hamid (Potomac Institute for Policy Studies), Mr. Berto Jongman (Dutch MOD), Mr. Scott Kesterson (Spatial Terra), COL Patrick Mahaney (ASWG), Dr. David Mandel (DRDC), Dr. Clark McCauley (Bryn Mawr College), Dr. Rodrigo Nieto Gomez (NPS), CAPT Wayne Porter (NPS), Ms. Farhana Qazi (Booz Allen Hamilton), Dr. Maria Rasmussen (NPS), LTC Michael Richardson (ASWG), Dr. Fouzia Saeed (Mehergarh), Dr. John Sawyer (START), Dr. Kalev Sepp (NPS), Mr. Mubin Shaikh (Liverpool University), MSG Sohail Shaikh (ASWG), Dr. Valerie Sitterle (Georgia Tech), MAJ Jason Spitaletta (JHU/APL), Dr. Peter Suedfeld (University of British Columbia)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".