O direito ao trabalho por parte das pessoas com deficiência: o acesso ao cargo público e seu efetivo exercício
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of the rights of persons with disabilities reveals the true battle fought by the minorities in Brazil. According to the last survey performed by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), in 2010, there are over 45 million Brazilians, about 23.9% of the national population, with some form of disability (sensory, cognitive, intellectual, physical, etc.). Among these, 61.1% of the persons with disabilities above 15 years of age have been deprived of proper primary education. Furthermore, only about 54.8% of the persons with disabilities have a formal occupation - a number at least 10% higher than the one observed for persons without any disabilities in the same age span (between 15 and 69 years of age). This shows that, in spite of the recent advances in the legislature, there is still a lot to be done in order materialize the access of the persons with disabilities to their most basic social rights and, through these, attain their much desired social inclusion. In this sense, the access to work emerges as one of the most powerful vectors for obtaining social inclusion, being the productive exercise of citizenship. Being born with a disability, or developing it over one's life, should not be a discriminating factor authorizing the restriction of the person with disability to his right to work. The Brazilian Federal Constitution, based on the values of democracy, equality, citzenship and justice, promotes the first affirmative action in pro of the persons with disabilities by, in its article 37, clause VIII, securing that a minimum number of the available jobs in the government be secured for this group of people. The access to a public office involves not only being hired for the job but also having the conditions necessary to effectively perform the duties associated with the acquired position. This, however, seems to be the newest setback faced, at least in the public service, by the persons with disabilities on their quest for materializing their right to work, and by it find in their productive force real human dignity. The national and international legislature offer several possible solutions for this problem, however, there are still a multitude of gaps the be filled so that the right to work can be effectively beheld by many of the persons with disabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".