MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070351557

Politique institutionnelle d'évaluation des apprentissages du Collège de Rimouski (PIEA)

2017· other· fr· W7070351557 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · 2017
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicQR Code Applications and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsContext (archaeology)Field (mathematics)Feature (linguistics)Perspective (graphical)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

et la qualit des processus d'valuation des apprentissages utiliss par l'ensemble des enseignantes et enseignants du Collge.DESTINATAIRES Les tudiantes et tudiants.Le personnel enseignant.DISTRIBUTION Le Cahier de gestion disponible sur le site WEB du Cgep de Rimouski.Les tudiantes et tudiants.Le personnel enseignant.CONTENU Prsentation La Politique Le cadre local d'application Quelques mots sur l'institution Acronymes et sigles A. Assise de la PIA B. Acteurs C. Mcanismes d'valuation D. Balises institutionnelles lies l'valuation E. Mesures particulires favorisant la russite F. Cheminement scolaire et diplomation G.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it