Parcours résidentiels de Siqinirmiut (Inuit vivant au Sud) à Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir des récits partagés par dix-sept Siqinirmiut (Inuit vivant au Sud), ce mémoire brosse un portrait exploratoire et qualitatif des parcours résidentiels des travailleur·se·s et des étudiant·e·s inuit à Montréal. Alors que près du tiers de la population inuit réside aujourd’hui hors de l’Inuit Nunangat et qu’une importante population est établie à Montréal, cette recherche élaborée en collaboration avec l’équipe du projet de recherche Qanuikkat Siqinirmiut? (How are people in the South?) vise à enrichir la compréhension des expériences et des conditions résidentielles des Inuit habitant la métropole et à documenter les obstacles et les défis spécifiques qu’illes rencontrent en la matière. L’approche des parcours résidentiels (Clapham 2002) utilisée permet d’aborder l’habiter dans une perspective élargie, en contextualisant les expériences du logement au sein d’autres dimensions du parcours de vie (migration, éducation, emploi, relations sociales, etc.), et en accordant une importance tout aussi grande aux relations (avec les lieux, avec les gens), aux évènements et à leurs significations, ainsi qu’aux lieux habités. La recherche explore ainsi trois aspects constitutifs de l’expérience du logement des Inuit travaillant ou étudiant à Montréal : (1) leurs parcours, leurs conditions et leurs aspirations résidentiels ; (2) l’insécurité résidentielle pouvant découler des obstacles et des défis spécifiques rencontrés sur le marché du logement, et finalement (3) les tactiques mises en oeuvre et les ressources mobilisées pour sécuriser un logement. \n \nBased on the stories shared by seventeen Siqinirmiut (Inuit living in the South), this master's thesis provides an exploratory and qualitative portrait of the housing pathways of Inuit workers and students in Montreal. With nearly one third of the Inuit population now residing outside of Inuit Nunangat and a significant population established in Montreal, this research, developed as a collaboration in the Qanuikkat Siqinirmiut? research partnership, aims to enrich the understanding of the housing experiences and conditions of Inuit living in the metropolis and to document the specific barriers and challenges they face in this regard. The housing pathways approach (Clapham 2002) allows for a broader understanding of the dwelling, contextualizing housing experiences within other dimensions of the life course (migration, education, employment, social relations, etc.). It also gives equal importance to relationships (with places, with people), to events and their meanings, as well as to the places inhabited. This research explores three aspects of the housing experience of Inuit working or studying in Montreal: (1) their housing pathways, including present housing conditions and housing aspirations; (2) the housing insecurity that can arise from the specific obstacles and challenges encountered in the housing market; and finally (3) the tactics used, and the resources mobilized to secure housing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".