MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070422772

"Open season" and resting retreats among the lakes, rivers, and mountains of northern Maine and New Brunswick.

2014· article· en· W7070422772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegetation (pathology)EctothermNatural (archaeology)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These falls are, as their name signifies, on the Aroostook River, about three miles from its junction with the St. John.Anywhere else than in this country of grand scenery, they would be noted, and people would make long journeys to see them."The Falls "is the name given to a series of cascades through a wild and picturesque gorge a quarter of a mile long, terminating in a deep pool with precipitous banks a hundred feet high.There is good trout-fishing both above and below the Falls, and a good fisherman may get a salmon in the great pool.Most persons who visit Andover spend a day at the Tobique Narrows, or go a short distance up that stream fishing.The Narrows will be more particularly described in a succeeding chapter.Five and a half miles from Andover is Aroostook Junction, whence a branch line goes to Caribou, Me., nineteen miles distant.The main line continues along the St. John, and at eighty- one miles from Woodstock reaches Grand Falls. EXCURSION TICKETS to points in Northern Maine and EasternProvinces on sale at all principal ticket-offices. * Runs every night between Boston and Bangor.All other trains daily, Sundays excepted.,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207