Optimal radius of centre interest area for recycling of construction and demilition waste
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Construction and demolition waste (CDW) presents a quarter of total originated waste amount in the EU. It follows that the treatment and another reusing of CDW is a current subject within waste management not only in Slovakia, but also in other states of EU. The significant role belongs to a location of waste origin and location of waste treatment place at recycling of construction waste. The basic systems of CDW recycling and their environmental impact at surroundings area of recycling place are analyzed in the submitted paper. There is proposed a suitable way of CDW treatment and interest area estimate method of existed recycling plants following this analysis, location of sources, markets and economic parameters of recycling costs. The expression of attribute is based on the knowledge of distribution logistic, which is able to describe whole distribution system of CDW recycling, elements and their interaction, which are necessary for calculation of interest area. This expression of interest area provide an effective utilization of existed power, estimate of requires on increasing power, eventually modernization of recycling plants and building of recycling centre in uncovered areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".