PENGOSONGAN SEWA RAK DAN GONDOLA DI SUZUYA \nSUPERSTORE ROCKY PLAZA PADANG \nDi TinjauMenurutFiqihMuamalah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skripsiiniberjudul:’’PRAKTEK SEWA MENYEWA RAK DAN GONDOLA DI \nSUZUYA SUPERSTORE ROCKY PLAZA PADANG MENURUT FIQH \nMUAMALAH. Yang di maksudjudul di atasadalahmenelitibentuktransaksisewa \nyang ada di Supermarket Padang, di kemudiandikajimenurutfiqhmuamalah. \nLatarbelakangpermasalahaniniadalahkarenasewamenyewamerupakanbagiandarikehid \nupanini, manusiatidaklepasdarisewamenyewa, di \nsampingitubagaimanasewamenyewatersebutmenjadiibadah, \nsalingtolongmenolongantar sesame manusia, bukanhanyauntukkepentinganpribadi. \nLokasipenelitianinibertempat di Suzuya Superstore Rocky Plaza Padang. Yang \nmenjadialasantempatinidijadikantempatpenelitianialah, \nkarenainginmengetahuitransaksisewamenyewa di \nsanadanjugadekatdenganrumah.Penulisaninimenggunakanpenelitianlapangan (field \nresearch), yaitudengancaraturunkelapanganlansung/ lokasipenelitian. \nMetode yang di \ngunakandalampenulisanskripsiiniadalahdenganmetodepembahasanKualitatifterhadap \ndata primer dansekunder.Data primer dalampenyusunaniniadalah data yang di \nperolehberupawawancara, sedangkan data sekunderadalah data pendukung yang \nberupabuku-buku yang berhubungandenganpenulisteliti. \nDari hasilpenelitian yang diperoleh di lapangan, \nbahwamenurutfiqhmuamalahtransaksisewamenyewa di Suzuya Superstore Rocky \nPlaza Padang masihadaterjadinyapenyimpangandariketentuansyariat Islam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".