Ontario Bird Records Committee Report for 1984
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes to the Checklist of Ontario Birds Yellow-nosed Albatross, Sooty/Shorttailed Shearwater and Anna's Hummingbird are new to the Checklist of Ontario Birds, increasing the provincial total to 486 species.Western Wood-Pewee (along with Yellow-nosed Albatross and Anna's Hummingbird) is new to southern Ontario.Dovekie and Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher (along with Sooty/Short-tailed Shearwater) are new to northern Ontario. Listing of RecordsFor all accepted records (and also records for which the identification was accepted but the origin is questionable), detailed information is always provided (if known) for the following: year of occurrence, number of birds, the plumage, age and sex of each individual, dates of occurrence, location, contributors and OBRC file number.All contributors who have provided documentation are listed; if a contributor is also a finder of the bird(s), their name is underlined.Additional finders of the bird(s), when known, are also listed, even though they did not provide any documentation.Place names in italics refer to various municipalities in Ontario including counties and districts.For accepted records, the current total number of records is indicated in parentheses after the species name.Common and scientific names, as well as taxonomy, follow the seventh Volume 29 Number 3 107 Figure 1.Members of the 2010 OBRC -front row, seated (left to right): Glenn Coady (Chair),
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.067 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".