MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7070521726

Physiological mechanisms of dyspnea during exercise in the presence of external thoracic restriction: role of increased neural respiratory motor drive

2014· dissertation· en· W7070521726 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Council of Historical ResearchAmerican Thoracic SocietyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health CentreInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory HealthUniversity of New EnglandMcGill University
KeywordsRespiratory systemMuscles of respirationControl of respirationRespiratory physiologyVentilation (architecture)ExertionAffect (linguistics)BreathingRespiratory disease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & rationale. "Dyspnea" refers to the awareness of breathing discomfort that accompanies an increase in physical activity in health and across various diseases. It is arguably the most severe and burdensome symptom experienced by patients with chronic pulmonary disorders and is an important contributor to physical activity-limitation and adverse health outcomes, including hospitalization and death. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of dyspnea on exertion in health and disease remain partially understood. Accumulating evidence implicates neuromechanical uncoupling of the respiratory system as a likely mechanism of activity-related dyspnea, particularly in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. According to this hypothesis, sensory intensity and unpleasantness ratings of dyspnea increase as a function of the widening disparity (as exercise progresses) between neural respiratory drive and the simultaneous response of the respiratory system, particularly as it relates to tidal volume (VT) expansion. An alternative and largely untested hypothesis states that the increased perception of dyspnea during exercise may reflect the awareness of increased neural respiratory drive needed achieve any given ventilation (V· E) in the presence of "abnormal" restrictive constraints on VT expansion. To date, the contribution of pathophysiological abnormalities in neural respiratory drive, dynamic respiratory mechanics and their interaction to the symptom of dyspnea during exercise in patients with chronic pulmonary disorders has proved difficult to study (beyond correlation) due to the presence of multiple co-morbidities that may independently contribute to the perception of dyspnea. Research Objectives. In light of the information cited above, the objectives of this research project were to better understand the physiological mechanisms of exertional dyspnea. Methods. This randomized cross-over study examined the acute effects of external thoracic restriction by chest wall strapping (CWS) – an accepted model of the "abnormal" restrictive constraints on VT expansion typical of patients with chronic pulmonary disorders - on detailed assessments of V· E, breathing pattern, dynamic respiratory mechanics, neural respiratory drive (as assessed by changes in the diaphragm electromyogram; EMGdi), and sensory intensity and unpleasantness ratings of dyspnea during symptom-limited incremental cycle exercise testing in 20 healthy, young men with normal lung function and cardiorespiratory fitness. Results. The key findings of this study include: [1] relatively greater dynamic mechanical constraints on VT expansion were evident during exercise with vs. without CWS; [2] EMGdi was consistently higher during exercise with vs. without CWS; [3] CWS had no effect on neuromechanical coupling of the respiratory system, as evidenced by relative preservation of the relationship between increasing EMGdi and VT expansion (adjusted for CWS-induced reductions in vital capacity) during exercise; [4] sensory intensity and unpleasantness ratings of dyspnea were significantly higher during exercise with vs. without CWS; and [5] CWS had no effect on the relationship between increasing EMGdi and each of the intensity and unpleasantness of dyspnea during progressive exercise. Conclusions & implications. We concluded that the increased perception of dyspnea during exercise with CWS could not be readily explained by increased neuromechanical uncoupling of the respiratory system, but that it likely reflected the awareness of increased neural respiratory drive needed to overcome the "abnormal" restrictive constraints on VT expansion. These findings may have implications for our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of exertional dyspnea causation in patients with chronic restrictive lung disorders. This information, in turn, may aid in the development of more effective dyspnea relieving interventions for use in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research→French-language works237,207→