Publication of Zygmunt Krasiński’s works in 1828–1914
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the article is to examine the publication of Zygmunt Krasiński’s works in the period of Poland’s partition. At least 177 editions of Krasiński’s works in 290 volumes were published in the analyzed period. Krasiński’s publications were issued in the entire territory of Poland’s parts, and also abroad, however nearly40 per cent came from Austrian provinces (Lvov, Krakow, Zloczów) almost 30 per cent from abroad (among all from Paris), nearly every fifth title – from the Russian part of Poland (from Warsaw) and nearly every eighth title – Prussian provinces (mainly from Mikolów and Poznań.) The most active popularizers of Krasiński’s oeuvre included such companies as Gebethner &Wolff, Gubrynowicz & Schmidt, Księgarnia Polska (in Paris), Księgarnia Polska (in Lvov), Karol Miarka (the younger). Initially, Krasiński’s works were published anonymously mainly abroad. Domestic output was boosted in the 2nd part of the 70s (mainly in Galicia), especially after the 1905 Revolution (in the Kingdom of Poland). The biggest amount of books issued in 1912., to commemorise poet’s 100th birth anniversary. As late as in the in 20th century first critical editions began to appear, a vast majority of editions though was published as a part of series, especially inexpensive series intended for mass readership. Some pieces published in Warsaw had been censored. So publishers from outside the cordon were adopting their editions to censorship conditions valid within the Russian part, omitting parts of texts, or making up the others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".