MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070617169

Physical and microstructural properties of insulating hempcrete mixes and their impact as infill system on the foundations due to increase in dead load

2020· dissertation· en· W7070617169 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHygrothermal properties of building materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCompressive strengthUltimate tensile strengthCompression (physics)Material propertiesMicrostructureLime mortar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hempcrete is a particularly promising lightweight, porous, and breathable biocomposite material that has the potential to significantly reduce the embodied energy related to the construction of buildings while improving their indoor air quality. However, hempcrete’s properties and performance depend on various parameters such as ingredient amounts, binder type, hurd characteristics (e.g., particle size and porosity), and the amount of water. Therefore, there is a great need for research that will focus on the development and production of hempcrete mixes and materials using local, Canadian resources. This research study characterizes the physical, microstructural, and mechanical properties of nine hempcrete mixes developed using lime and eco-friendly pozzolans such as metakaolin, crushed brick, and natural hydraulic lime in varying relative proportions. Furthermore, it compares three different types of hempcrete walls against the conventionally insulated walls of a single-story house located in Winnipeg, using S-Timber 2019 software. The microstructure analysis of hurd particles showed their porous nature. The dry densities of all design mix range from 294.59 kg/m3 to 399.68 kg/m3, with the majority (⁓73%) falling between 320 kg/m3 and 370 kg/m3. The average compression strength of the developed samples ranged between 0.11 MPa and 0.51 MPa, whereas the average splitting tensile strength ranged between 0.010 MPa and 0.0348 MPa. The results show a positive correlation between the hempcrete’s mechanical properties and density, mainly, in the case of compressive strength. The microstructure analysis of all the design mixes exhibit adequate adhesion at the interface, and present high carbonation with some hydrates. The main findings suggest that locally sourced metakaolin and crushed brick are excellent alternatives to the expensive, imported hydraulic lime. The modeling analysis indicates an increase in the dead loads and foundation sizes due to hempcrete infill compared to the base case. The results also indicate that the best option for a house considering the increase in dead loads and foundation sizes, is a wall case that meets the energy code through the thinner wall composed of 100 mm of mineral wool and 140 mm of hempcrete.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicHygrothermal properties of building materialsFrench-language works237,207