Pedagogía terapéutica en Educación Infantil. Análisis y tratamiento de un caso de Trastorno Específico del Lenguaje
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Puesto que este Trabajo de Fin de Grado, está dedicado a la Pedagogía Terapéutica, y en la edad en la que se da el caso de observación, uno de los aspectos más importantes es el desarrollo de la capacidad expresiva y de producción, este trabajo en concreto irá dirigido hacia el TEL, Trastorno Específico del Lenguaje, analizándose en él un caso observado en el Prácticum III, del cual se ha podido disponer de informes anteriores, entrevistas con las familias, así como la propia experiencia de contacto, en las aulas tanto de Pedagogía Terapéutica como de Audición y Lenguaje, con el caso en cuestión. El trabajo estará casi exclusivamente dedicado al campo de la expresión, que podría dificultar la comunicación verbal, pudiendo llegar a retrasar, de manera significativa los aprendizajes, convirtiéndose así en tema prioritario, sobre todo en Audición y Lenguaje.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".