Profil détaillé des dépenses de consommation des ménages 2002 : MRC du Fjord-du-Saguenay, Saint-Ambroise, Centre-Ouest-Fjord-du-Saguenay, Bas-Saguenay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
9 208 974 $ 7 009 062 $ 24 023 775 $ 40 241 811 $ 20,1% 19 758 715 241 $ 20,0% Logement 7 846 321 $ 6 233 450 $ 21 448 217 $ 35 527 988 $ 17,8% 21 088 425 523 $ 21,4% Entretien ménager 3 169 537 $ 2 523 899 $ 8 732 861 $ 14 425 814 $ 7,2% 6 456 576 146 $ 6,5% Articles et accessoires d'ameublement 1 801 996 $ 1 376 528 $ 4 735 973 $ 7 914 497 $ 4,0% 3 703 052 202 $ 3,7% Habillement 3 562 380 $ 2 674 854 $ 9 198 223 $ 15 435 457 $ 7,7% 7 209 977 330 $ 7,3% Transport 9 234 615 $ 7 280 914 $ 24 955 598 $ 41 471 127 $ 20,7% 16 905 030 077 $ 17,1% Soins de santé 1 418 247 $ 1 088 300 $ 3 745 445 $ 6 251 601 $ 3,1% 3 164 929 036 $ 3,2% Soins personnels 1 203 025 $ 887 361 $ 3 057 150 $ 5 147 536 $ 2,6% 2 660 294 363 $ 2,7% Loisirs 2 384 950 $ 2 440 738 $ 8 558 944 $ 13 384 632 $ 6,7% 7 421 559 800 $ 7,5% Matériel de lecture/Autres imprimés 243 979 $ 223 200 $ 777 910 $ 1 245 089 $ 0,6% 773 042 638 $ 0,8% Éducation 627 793 $ 650 359 $ 2 238 411 $ 3 516 563 $ 1,8% 1 464 984 552 $ 1,5% Tabac/Alcool 1 728 168 $ 1 447 594 $ 4 951 589 $ 8 127 351 $ 4,1% 3 928 090 937 $ 4,0% Dépenses diverses 1 432 851 $ 1 303 477 $ 4 540 039 $ 7 276 367 $ 3,6% 4 232 281 055 $ 4,3% Total 43 862 836 $ 35
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.147 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".