MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070673122

Problem of stochastic control of enterprise

2016· article· en· W7070673122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Archive of Poltava University of Economics and Trade (University of Poltava) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlState spaceComputationState (computer science)Controller (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Control (management)Stochastic control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction.In this work we extend the approach of the previous researches to the measurement feedback case.We remove the assumption that the state of the system is available for feedback and show how algorithms from the previous researches can be used in the measurement feedback case.We derived solvability conditions for the problem but analytical computation of the optimal controller turned out to be extremely difficult task.The feasibile approach is to use model predictive control technique.So far, we have obtained several computational algorithms for model predictive control of constrained systems that are subject to stochastic disturbances.These results have been based on the assumption that all states of the plant are available for feedback.Resultst.In this scientific work, we consider the more general case in which we assume that output of the plant is measured and available for feedback.In this case, static feedbacks are no longer sufficient and we need to study dynamic feedbacks.We consider the plant given by the discrete time state space equations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it