Research on waterjet in Institute of Geonics of the AS CR from 1990 to 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper is continuation of an article published in the proceedings of the conference "Water Jet 2011 - Research, Development, Applications”. By 1990, the work is briefly described in the article (VAŠEK 2011). The follow-up work carried out in the period 1990 - 2006 is the subject of this article. The paper gives a brief overview of the author's participation at the World Mining Congress in Beijing (1990), a collaboration with CNR Canada, CNR Cagliari (Italy), the organization of international conferences GEOMECHNICS 91, 93 and 96. The cooperation with University of Missouri Rola (hereinafter UMR) USA, Cornerstone Technologies and Pennsylvania Micronics, cooperation within the project EU-Inco Copernicus (1995 - 1999) and the project of Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (hereinafter GAAV) "Mechanical breakages and disintegration processes of coal and rock - theoretical aspects, applications, outlook” (2001-2006) are also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".