MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7070715533

Predictive modeling of moisture movement within soil cover systems for saline/sodic overburden piles

2012· article· en· W7070715533 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydraulic conductivityCover (algebra)OverburdenHydrology (agriculture)Surface runoffWater contentVegetation (pathology)MoistureField (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research presented in this thesis describes the application of the computer modeling
\nprogram Soil Cover 2000 as a tool for predicting the soil-atmosphere fluxes and
\nassociated moisture movement in a variety of soil cover systems. The four systems
\nexamined for this thesis are used to reclaim a saline-sodic shale overburden deposit
\nlocated at the Syncrude Canada Limited mine site, 40 km North of Fort McMurray,
\nAlberta, Canada. The research represents the second phase of a cover instrumentation
\nand modeling research program.
\n
\nCharacterization of the soil cover materials and field responses was carried out during
\nphase one research conducted by Boese (2003) and Meiers (2002). The models were
\nmade to simulate field conditions by using multi-modal soil-water characteristic curves
\nand hydraulic conductivity functions, and by estimating the growth of the plant species
\nfound on the covers. Computed and measured field response patterns for the four cover
\nsystems matched reasonably well for a five month period from May 19 to October 22,
\n2000. The models were then applied to predict the field measurements for the same
\nperiod during 2001. Only two adjustments needed to be made to the model parameters
\nin order to simulate the 2001 data; namely changing the dominant vegetation (and
\nrelated growth parameters) and; adjusting the saturated hydraulic conductivity to match
\nMeiers (2002) field measurements.
\n
\nThe calibrated model inputs were used to simulate five cover designs to test their
\nperformance during extreme climate conditions. The main objective was to ascertain
\nwhether a thinner cover system than the currently recommended cover thickness of 1 m
\ncould be effective at the mine. The results indicate that the peat layer is required to
\nminimize the amount of runoff and to decrease the potential for saturated conditions
\nforming at the base of the cover. For a peat-over-till cover system to work effectively,
\nthe peat layer needs to be thicker than 30 cm to further reduce the potential for saturated
\nconditions forming at the base. However, thinning the till layer is acceptable since the
\nresults show that a thinner till layer has little impact on the performance of the cover.
\nThe overall cover thickness needs to be greater than 60 cm to improve plant survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it