Reclaiming the Personal: Oral History in Post-Socialist Europe. Ed. Natalia Khanenko-Friesen and Gelinada Grinchenko. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. 328 pages.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last few decades in humanities and social sciences revealed that scholars tend to work interdisciplinarily, emphasizing on the value of holistic approaches while researching societies and human interactions.This volume is framed as interdisciplinary research, gathering writings of oral historians, cultural anthropologists and sociologists.Therefore, it will be of interest to a wide scholarly audience.Cultural anthropology and oral history share two important features.Theoretically each discipline aims to make voicelessness vocal, in other words, to give voices to those who are absent from history textbooks and whose lives don't fit in current national projects and political ideologies.Neither oral historians nor cultural anthropologists are interested in revealing the "true" or "objective" past.Instead they deal with people's personal interpretations of the past.Methodologically both disciplines use the method of interviewing to record a person's narration, documenting people's life
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".