Re-Constructing the Fragments of Michael Ondaatje’s Works
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Patient anglais, le film d'Anthony Minghella sorti sur les écrans en mars 1997 et mettant en vedette Ralph Fiennes, Willem Dafoe, Kristin Scott-Thomas et Juliette Binoche a certainement fait découvrir au public français le dernier roman de Michael Ondaatje publié en 1992. Né au Sri Lanka, éduqué en Angleterre, Ondaatje s'est imposé comme l'un des plus grands auteurs canadiens depuis qu'il a émigré au Canada en 1962. L'apport culturel des immigrés a enrichi considérablement la littérature canadienne d'expression anglaise. Inclassable à cause de sa transgression des genres l'oeuvre ondaatjienne est forte car instable dans son mélange foisonnant et ironique. Ondaatje tisse un grand texte à partir de fils épars multicolores et relate la quête d'un homme déchiré par son désir de transcender son état. Seule la mort donne l'éternité. Ce livre évoque les jeux de masques d'une écriture qui emprunte tous les tons et saisit la richesse d'une diversité volontairement déconstruite dans la bonne tradition de la littérature post-coloniale et post-moderne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".