Reinventing Habitat 67 : a methodical approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The central source of inspiration for this work is Habitat 67 by Moshe Safdie in Montreal. With its unconventional structure of stacked and connected modules, Habitat 67 presents a unique interpretation of the modular housing concept. Originally conceived as a response to the complex requirements of urban housing, it combines high density living space with individual privacy and quality of life in an innovative way. The aim of this thesis is to analyse and reinterpret Safdie’s methodology in order to update and extend traditional concepts with contemporary approaches. This methodology forms the theoretical basis for the design of the project. Through the systematic manipulation and rearrangement of architectural elements, new morphological aggregations are created that form the basis for the design of the new facility. The resulting structure is located close to the current Habitat 67 and is intended to form its own adaptable infrastructure that fulfils different needs. The result is an architectural concept that is versatile and adaptable to meet the dynamic requirements of a contemporary urban environment
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".